"This is a schematic that a friend and myself came up with together when we were thinking about this. Some medical researchers are starting to see, that there is a highly orchestrated amazingly intricate metabolic and immune system blue print which is highly influential upon the normal growth and development of brains and immune systems. and that's whats at stake, here right? brains and immune systems. the microbiome which is all the bacteria, viruses, and fungi which are supposed to be living in you and on you, the immune system and the nervous systems are interdependent and intimately related. the strengths and weaknesses of the child in their future lives are determined in part before gestation by the health of the parents and the diet of the parents, during gestation by what the mother is doing, what the medical system is doing to the mother, what she is thinking, how she is feeling, and during the first 2 years of that baby's life after it is born. That's what I call constituting the 3 year pregnancy. which is depicted schematically here. This whole circle is the 3 yr pregnancy. This denotes the period of time before conception, where it's been shown that even the diet of the father has an impact on how that baby turns out. Then we have the pregnancy period. This is a continuum. Once pregnancy starts there is a shift in the mother's immune system. It's basically to create a balance so that trophoblast doesn't invade through her and so that she doesn't reject it at the same time. So her immune system basically goes anti-inflammatory and the whole goal during this situation is to keep the baby anti inflammatory. so the microbiome of the mother is key to that. then right before birth she shifts into a pro inflammatory situation. and her microbiome changes again. that is key to triggering labor. then we have birth and there's another shift. to dampen down all the catacholomines and the inflammation that's necessary to have a normal healthy vaginal delivery. then we have the 2 years after wards. We have continuation of mother's immunity.They're still connected and the breastmilk takes over. And so we have the infant gut microbiome that has to be established and that's extremely important that that happens on time. and with the right microbes and it's not interfered with with antibiotics "just in case" for all sorts of situations for the mother and the baby. towards the end of that the baby graduates and the baby's immune system turns slightly pro inflammatory. and that's where we live during health."
"At the core of this is a factory inside every cell responsible for listening to, responding to, and sometimes defending itself from its environment and it's not all about genes. there is a revolution in genetics and biology that's reshaping the way scientists once thought about inheritance and our genetic fate. it's a gamechanger. the epigenome is the conductor of the blueprint manual. DNA is just a blueprint, it has no activity by itself. epigenome means above the genome. and this is a whole system of signals which either tightens and shuts down or opens up and activates sections of DNA to make proteins which can produce different results depending on the signals they receive from the outside world. those signals can come from drugs, food, chemicals, social stress, and even the predominant tenor of an individual's thoughts. and epigenetic changes are also inheritable. the scientists used to think that the slate was wiped clean during conception, but now we know that epigenetic changes that happen to your baby, or that happen to your grandmother can be passed down. and can magnify with each successive generation. obviously this doesn't just apply to humans. it applies to animals. and it's most quickly seen and recognized by home gardeners."
"here is a really obvious example of epigenetic differences. these are 2 different plants with the same genetic seed planted the same year. this is an italian tomato called a capri. the seeds are the same. the big difference is the quality of the soil, the watering, and the sun levels. the outcome is dramatically different. even to the untrained eye. this plant might get 10 or 20 tomatos if you're lucky this one had over 100. what tomato plants get to eat has a huge bearing on how they grow. the same applies to animals and humans"
"All mammals have a gene called an Agouti. But that gene can become mutant. When a mouse's mutant Agouti gene is completely unmethylated it's coat is yellow and its obese and its prone to diabetes and cancer. when the agouti gene is methylated the coat color is brown, the mouse has a low disease risk, and is thin. fat yellow mice and skinny brown mice are genetically identical. the fat yellow mice are different because they have had an epigenetic change that occured from the amount of B12 and folate and choline that the mother ate when she was pregnant with this mouse. If she didn't get enough B12, folic acid, and choline then this agouti mutant will come out and if she gets enough then this one is what will come out. this is an example showing how genes are activated and its a more common issue than the genes themselves and just what is in the DNA. so what denotes environment? this is a very important question so anything outside your cells constitutes environment. whether its inside or outside your body. and variations in the environment can make an instant change. just as folic acid, B12, and choline, make big changes in these mice. environmental changes in a pregnant woman can do exactly the same thing. to start to understand what makes a healthy child. we have to understand that the old central dogma that many of us may have learned in college, that our genes control us. That's not true. Our genes don't control us. They are read out manuals with lots of different options dependent on the owner. DNA is only responsible for about 10% of how we turn out. you know all that junk DNA we hear about? it's not junk. blueprints, like DNA have no activity or power on their own. they are controlled from outside. so let's get rid of that old dogma."
"This is a schematic of a cell. So imagine the membrane going all the way around. inside you have the cytoplasm. you have the nucleus at the very center. and this is the genetic material. the DNA. each cell membrane of every one of your cells has around 100 thousand protein switches that open and close to various substances and send signals inside depending on what's happening out in the environment. signal (transduction/transsuption?) is what this is called and it is key to when and which proteins are made in the cell and how that cell will function. our environment does most of the controlling through these cell membranes. thus the nucleus is not the brain of the cell like we used to think. in fact some cells live for up to 2 months without a nucleus. no cell lives without a membrane. if you interrupt these processes in the membrane the cell will become dysfunctional. death or life messages can be sent through these membranes into the nucleus and that's what determines whether you grow normally, you grow wrong, or you mutate. 90% of what comes from the blueprint of your genes is controlled by what the cell surface encounters. the broth your cells are exposed to can be stress hormones or endorphins, nutrients or starvation, inflammation or non inflammation, and on and on. What made the difference in those agouti mice was not their mutant genes but how those genes responding to the environment their cells were bathing in. whether those cells were marinating in proper nutrients or not. that's the basis of epigenetics."
"DNA is typically represented by the double helix. there are 3 main mechanisms by which genes are epigenetically expressed or suppressed. it's called DNA methylation. this is what a chromosome looks like when its all curled up inside the nucleus. but if you uncurl this, it's probably miles long. and then you uncurl it. a secondary form, uncurls even further. these little coils inside that are called histones, and that can uncoil even further. and then this is what you're used to seeing as the double helix. so we've got lots of twisting going on here and covering up. most of the DNA is inside and it's not accessible until it's woken up and told what to do. the main mechanisms are methylation. and methyl is just a chemical group that can sit on here and it sits on a particular base. and will either activate the gene or tell it to stay asleep. then we can have accetalation of these histone proteins or the coils, like your garden hose can be wound up, if this becomes accetelated then this unwinds and the DNA becomes exposed. and then we have something really miraculous and amazing. this is micro RNA. this is another revolution in understanding of genetics that is going on today. micro RNA is everywhere. it's in breast milk it's in cows milk. it's in food. it's in placenta. it has all kinds of activity that was previously unappreciated. how and when this epigenetic alteration occurs is largely dependent on what that cell membrane is encountering."
"through DNA fingerprinting we can tell that microbes are in the placenta, the amniotic fluid, the umbilical cord, and many other places, including meconium. which means that the baby has been exposed throughout pregnancy to microbes. what we have here is meconium samples of 4 different individuals, this is an adult for comparison, this is a baby from a healthy mother, this is a baby from a mother who had gestational diabetes, this is a baby's meconium from a mother that had type 2 diabetes, and this is the color coding of the different microbes. and what you can see is that they are very different from person to person, or group to group, depending on the status of the mother. one of the most important elements of a healthy child, is a healthy microbe profile in the mother and the baby, and that's dependent on doctors understanding what normal really is, and understanding what else they can do besides napalming the gut of the mother, and tossing antibiotics into the situation where they don't need to be. mother's milk continues to maintain the baby anti inflammatory just like the placenta was. antiobiotics, antifungals, poor diet with low minerals, low fiber will put the mother infant dyad at a disadvantage at any point before this period."
"until relatively recently it was assumed that microbes in human milk were contaminates from the mother's skin, and that human milk was sterile, but when they collected milk under aseptic techniques bacteria were still found, so scientists were mystified and they decided to look at the microbial DNA fingerprint and were astonished to find that human milk bacteria had different DNA fingerprints when compared to that mother's skin bacteria. a vaginally born baby gets its first gut flora bolus transplant from its mothers vaginal flora which is hugely complex, and this is flushed down into the gut by precolustrum clear fluid, then that's followed by colustrum bolus, and then ends up in mature milk which still continues to have microbes in it. there are approximately 10,000 bacteria per mL in aseptically collected human milk, but that's only part of the story. the milk that looks like a white liquid is actually a live transplant made from the mother's own blood."
"Human milk is a pulsing living organism, which has one main function outside of food, and that is to keep everything in the baby as much as possible anti-inflammatory. breastmilk has substances which stop pathogens attaching and other substances which go after invading pathogens and butcher them to pieces. development of the intestines and mucosal immunity and growth of many of that infants tissues are mediated by human milk. that master butcher I mentioned before is called HAMLET. it stands for "human alpha lactalbumin made lethal to tumors". it kills tumors. its being used by the oncology industry, or they're attempting to anyway, to treat cancer. but it happens to also be lethal to pneumococcus and encapsulated bacteria. if you think this is a long list here, of whats in milk, look at stem cells, micro RNA, messenger RNA, Erythroproitin making blood, we've got factors that make bone and orchestrates bone , food for the baby, food for the microbes, there's all kinds of stuff going on there, but this is actually a really short list, because every time scientists looks with new technology, not only does the list grow longer, but they find multiple functions for many components of milk that were formerly assumed to have had singular functions. HAMLET is a really good example of a protein that can be either a food or a killer. and we used to think that proteins only had one function but it turns out that depending on the shape of HAMLET its either going to be a killer or it will be a protein food"
"but why is it that babies don't respond well to encapsulated bacteria?, because this is afterall, the reason these bacterial vaccines are being mandated. first up, as I said, breastfed babies do cope very well. human milk has that thing called HAMLET which goes in like a rampant frontline army with bayonets and mows them down. however formula fed babies don't have that kind of infantry cover. the design of the infant immune system depends on breastmilk to cover encapsulated bacterial infection. and this is the risk the baby takes to ensure successful development of the brain and the immune system. However for decades, formula has been considered to be as good or nearly as good as breastmilk. many pediatricians have little idea of the complexity of immune protection from breastmilk. they have no idea of the genetic modifcations which micro RNA and messenger RNA conduct in breastmilk. or even what that cow micro RNA and formula might be doing. most of the children they see with encapsulated bacterial infections are formula fed. and little thought is given to why that is. I hear so many cases of mothers who want to breastfeed in the hospital and because the doctors and the nurses don't think she is making enough, they insist on topping off with formula. if you give a baby formula, their gut flora changes for 2 weeks. our breastfeeding rates in america are pathetic. even the World Health Organization reccomends to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months and to continue at least partially for 2 years. that's really important and it should become obvious now why that is so important. instead doctors primary thinking, is what can we inject into babies to stop these infections, but if they understand neonatal immunology and breastmilk a bit better they might ask why are we not making sure these babies are being fully breastfed?"
"so the next logical question is what might happen if you tried to help a neonatal immune system protect itself with a vaccine Especially when the baby is preprogrammed to dampen inflammation?"
"this is important because we know that in children who do have competent immune systems, vaccination is still a trauma of considerable intensity. this study was from 1967. and you're probably not going to see another one like this. but Dr. Del Campos studied 200 children over a 5 yr period. they were given all different kinds of vaccinations. he looked at them in many different ways. in 1967 the vaccination program was a fraction of what it is now, and children were vaccinated at older ages. but this is still what they found. he documented adrenal stress, high levels of acid production, massive inflammation, derangements in clotting and bleeding factors, lipids that went haywire, they went up and down and sometimes they didn't go down. and heart rhythms that went off track. so what happens if you do this in babies who are supposed to be in their anti inflammatory window of opportunity. after all we know that a baby's immune system does not want to respond this way. pediatricians however refer to this programmed non responsiveness over and over and so does the medical literature, as inadequate, sluggish, defective, weak and in need of correction. they want to make it respond like an adult. so what do they do to make it respond like an adult?"
"they give vaccines with something in them which throws a red alert switch and forces a normal baby to respond whether they want to or not. the process goes like this. injection of aluminum adjuvant vaccines, most of which are, into a muscle..... not eaten, not intravenous, but injected into muscle (very important), causes the release of uric acid, DNA, and cell components from those damaged cells that the needle went into. and what that does is it turns on an inflammatory cascade which is represented here. these inflammazomes get activated and T helper cells come in and macrophages just continuing to eat aluminum until they basically eat themselves to death sometimes, or they carry it off to other places in the body. aluminum's mechanism of action as an adjuvant is still not fully understood even though it has been used in vaccines for over 70 years. what is known about the mechanism and about the overall effects of aluminum is very disturbing and it's also well documented in toxicology literature and in independent medical research literature. basically aluminum sets the immune system on fire to accomplish what the antigens couldn't do on their own. if you inject a baby with pneumococcal vaccine that does not have aluminum the baby won't respond to it. because it's programmed to be anti inflammatory. so the aluminum is basically to override the baby's, and even adults, anti inflammatory predisposition. the problem with this is while vaccines promoters do their best to brainwash people to into thinking that aluminum is essential for healthy growth. I've even seen vaccine promoting doctors that are quite famous say that its necessary for normal gestation. they also say that it's easily excreted. well that's just a lie on wheels. which is whipped around the globe while no one appears to have a clue where to look in the science to find out if it's actually true. guess what it's not true"
"scientists in 2013 say "although traditional aluminum based adjuvants have been used in humans since the 1930's, there is still not enough information about the manner of their actions. so if there is not enough information about how aluminum acts, how then is it possible to say that it is safe? the simplest way is to say nothing and rely on the fact that most parents don't ask questions and don't go looking for the answers themselves. they think well the mercury is gone, that's good. well guess what the aluminum is nowhere near gone and it's much higher levels than the mercury ever was. when parents do ask they discover not only is little known about the action of aluminum but worse there is plenty of evidence explaining in considerable details some of aluminum's many known dangers. one of these dangers is related to what we are talking about with epigenetics. the interference of epigenetics in the cell membrane. well the interface of aluminum damage is exactly at the same place. in that cell membrane. we know that cell membranes and myelin are affected by aluminum."
"and this is just a schematic of a cell membrane and some of those proteins that are sitting in there. and aluminum goes in there. have a look at this membrane and consider that each cell has around 100 thousand switches, that open and close it to various substances and affect the inside and the nucleus. then consider the fact that after aluminum exposure the cell membranes and myelin become stiff and dysfunctional. (the references are on the slide). aluminum is a death signal to cells. it's not a nutrient. it has no place in the body. and it should never ever be injected into a muscle. another pediatric fallacy of the past is that a baby's blood brain barrier is impermeable. it's not and when it comes to aluminum neither is yours."
"this is a schematic from an incredible article, by Kawahara from 2011. he shows, and not only him but many other authors have shown, in trojan horse fashion, aluminum does cross the blood brain barrier, in macrophages and with other carriers that shuttle it across. Kawahar's article is really important because it supports with 176 scientific references the fact that aluminum is a death factor for cells. aluminum binds to phosphorous in DNA. and it influences various genes. we talked about epigenetics. things can be turned off or shut off. it also binds to ATP. and impairs energy production. ATP is this substance that gives us energy in the mitochondria. it displaces calcium and magnesium on enzymes. enzymes won't work if they don't have the proper minerals and cofactors. and it basically makes the enzymes useless to do their enzymatic work. and worse than that it increases the halflife of aluminum in the body. because it's still hanging out there on these enzymes. it damages cell membranes by catalyzing this peroxidation reaction. and that's just the beginning of the havoc that aluminum causes. remember that cell membranes control how genes function, how the inside of the cell functions, how cells talk to eachother, whether we grow, whether we die, whether cells differentiate into organs, or whether they turn into cancer."
"so the question we need to ask is 2 fold. why do we have so many vaccines containing aluminum? why are there no other safe or effective adjuvants being used? the medical model says that aluminum is safe in babies. this article says we need safer adjuvants. this is an article from 2013. while the body is able to excrete aluminum in its natural form. the element aluminum like mercury is toxic to all life forms when concentrated in their tissues. how would aluminum concentrate in tissues? it just wouldn't be excreted rapidly like we're told that it is."
"There have been 2 analyses, looking at whether or not aluminum at current dosing is safe or not. It's important to look at both of these studies to analyze how the authors came to their conclusions. The first is this Keith from 2002. Keith used only part of the total vaccine aluminum schedule in the calculations of whether or not the ingested and injected aluminum surpassed these theoretical minimal risk levels for babies. so this is the minimal risk level line, and these are the injections, and these are formula, and breastmilk. we know that aluminum is in formula and it's in breastmilk. it shouldn't be but it is. here is the spikes right there that go through that minimal risk level, during the time of vaccination. what happens to brain, nervous, and immune systems in these conservatively estimated 3 days. also not taken into account is the cumulative body burden of aluminum especially in infants with lower than normal kidney functions, which is a common occurrence up to 6 months and can even happen up to 2 years. well this analysis grossly underestimates the aluminum excess to infants. it certainly doesn't take into account the aluminum the mother was injected with with hep a, hep b, Dtap, that are recommended to them now. But someone in the pro vaccine world must have realized that Keith's study had the potential to cause trouble if someone thought about what might happen to that graph if you added in all of the vaccines and considered kidney function. so in 2011, a group of talking heads came up with the most extraordinarily assuming science since bloodletting. I'm glad you're all sitting down"
"Just take a quick look at the 3 points here and you'll see why the minimal risk levels are fictitious. Because they used a miniscule single dose of aluminum. .7 micrograms. consider that your 2 month old baby will get 1200 micrograms of aluminum injected intramuscularly. they used .7 micrograms on a full grown man with normal kidney function. and later they did it to 6 more people to track the aluminum excretion. they used an intravenous dose, which does none of those inflammatory processes that I mentioned. it would go right to kidneys and be filtered. and it would not have behaved nearly as maliciously, as an intramuscular injection. they also used a form of aluminum called aluminum citrate which has never been a form of aluminum in vaccines. then they simply followed the blood and urine levels of radio labeled aluminum. they used the radio labeled aluminum for the intravenous. and they did separate studies where they fed rodents high levels of aluminum and determined this minimum risk level from rodents and these adults I'm talking to you about. they made this comment about monkeys. they said towards the end of the article. "An infant monkey study could provide these data, (meaning more accurate data), however given the present lack of evidence of harm due to the current aluminum levels, such studies may be a low priority." of course doing monkey studies would be a low priority, because if they did them and found that aluminum was causing trouble, they were coincidentally linking with other things, or calling it idiopathic, which is what I see happening most, the vaccine companies would not only have to reformulate vaccines, but they would have to go back to the start, and complete millions of dollars worth of phase testing for safety and efficacy. neither the vaccine manufacturers the FDA, the CDC would ever tolerate that."
"Here's proof. This was a study from Dr. Thomas Jefferson. I think from 2007. they did a meta analysis. they looked at studies that had already been done comparing people who had the diptheria, tetanus, pertussis vaccines to those who hadn't. Just that one vaccine. They determined that "despite a lack of good quality evidence we do not recommend that any further research on this topic is undertaken." this was the Cochrane collaborative database, an independent research conglomerate. why would they say this? They gave away why they said it later in the article and I'm just going to read to you what the article said. It's one paragraph. "Replacement of aluminum compounds in currently licensed vaccines would necessitate the introduction of a completely new compound that would have to be investigated before licensing. No obvious candidates to replace aluminum are available." (they tried Squalene in Gulf War, that didn't work very well. they also tried it over in Scandinavia and there was an epidemic of narcolepsy) "SO withdrawal for safety reasons would severely affect the immunogenicity and protective effect of some currently licensed vaccines and threaten immunization programs worldwide." (and we all know what else it would threaten). This type of commentary is made repeatedly. It flies in the face of reason. Well established, peer reviewed, independent publications are ignored time and again. I have many more examples of such blatant denial but not enough time to discuss it. I have a pile of papers down here with more of it."
"Then there was this study done, the interpretation of which, will boggle the mind. This was actually a good study because what this doctor did was looked at 2 month old infants after they received the usual 1200 microgram aluminum dose, for the 3 intramuscular vaccines. the aluminum was given per the usual infant schedule. then she measured the blood levels and the urine levels of aluminum over the subsequent 12 hours, because we are told that the aluminum is rapidly excreted within 12 to 24 hours. This paper said that they were relieved to notice that no significant change in levels of urinary or serum aluminum were seen after vaccination. And I read that and I thought why are they relieved to see that? I wrote this doctor, and I queried her. I told her about the problem with low filtration rates of infants. Where is the aluminum going? what's happening? so they injected these babies with aluminum. they didn't see it rise in the blood, and they didn't see it come out in urine. so you can put that equation together right? Her reply to me was: We don't really know what happens to the aluminum at this point in time. As you said more research is needed in this area. I wrote her back again, and sent some more studies and some more questions and she hasn't written me back."
"So with all that in mind, have a look at this nasty partial list of aluminum's known effects on the body. When I say partial list, I have about 4 more slides I could have been put on here, but I just boiled it down to some of the things that I think are really important. These scientists are not the only ones sounding a warning about the potential results of aluminum in neonates."
"This Dr. Dietert wrote some really amazing articles that talk about these windows of vulnerability and all of the environmental problems that could occur during this development, but they never once mention vaccines. This is a dangerous place to go for researchers. Their grant money tends to dry up when they go there. To show you a little bit. This is a 2 year line. Right here we have conception. And 5 to 7 weeks of gestation. 12 -24 weeks of gestation. and then birth happens around here. and this is the 2 yr old baby. Each of these blue boxes here denotes immune cells in the brain that are developing at this period of time. SO they talk about these 9 developmental windows of the immune system. It's pretty amazing"
"This is an example. This was given to me by a Merck vaccine scientist. So I don't have a reference for you. I've looked into this myself and found this is all absolutely true in other scientific writings. So if you look at this graph, which show gene expression of various brain cells. You can see that if you derailed any of these processes, it would be like throwing a spanner into the spokes of a child's bike while they were speeding down a steep hill. Gene expression is at a maximum for many types of brain nerves, even up to 4 years. One of them when you're born is maximally regulated. That's this one here, cholecystokinin which is about whether you're thirsty, hungry, whether you even know you are. Then you have these 2 gene expression here, at 3 months 100% gene expression which continues at 100% for just about 2 years and those have to do with the ability to think, and nerve excitation, and muscle tone. And then at 3-4 yrs you have a peak in this one here, which has to do with motivational and reward related behavior. We know that inflammation and aluminum can alter normal gene expression. Keeping infants and children away from inflammatory influences is really important, because where the damage occur in the brain, is the microglia and the astrocites, which are involved in every major aspect of brain development and function, including synapse formation, meaning how nerves talk to each other."
"What we have here is a schematic of a brain nerve and here we have migratory microglia. They can come in from the periphery. Arresting microglia. This one here is activated. You can see it's secreting cytokines. A fully activated one here, They change morphology. And then you have an which is another kind of immune cell. It's really important that these immune cells up regulate and function when you need them to and they turn off when you don't need them to work. It's very tightly regulated. inflammation and anti inflammation in the brain. It's very important. Brain pathology is to a large extent, a pathology of these immune cells called microglia. Cytokines are these chemicals that are secreted by immune cells, are one of the largest and most diverse families of signaling molecules in the body. Under healthy conditions, most cytokines, circulate at very low concentrations, but can increase up to 1,000 fold during trauma, stress, or infection. They can be both pro or anti inflammatory. They can work together for synergy. Though after stress, they become pro inflammatory. The brain is very sensitive to the proper balance of these cytokines."
"What are some known microglial triggers? Vaccination stimulation, vaccinations components, including aluminum, DNA, RNA, and protein fragments, which exist not only from the animals that vaccines are incubated in including monkeys, cows, pigs, chicks, aborted human fetuses. There is mercury still in the multidose influenze vaccines, and there are still trace amounts of mercury in some of the other vaccines. MSG which actually is in the inhaled flu vaccines, and is in food. Gut infections are imbalance and inflammation also, because of the brain bowel connection which we now know absolutely exists. It's very well documented now. There are 3 references for you if anybody has any doubts on what I'm saying"
"This is the second part of the experiment. What they did is they looked at different days, and they found that on day 6 something special happened. So we have the 1 day old mouse that we did not vaccinate. We waited until day 6 when there was much more variety of dendritic cells and they had different kinds of receptors. There was a much more mature array of dendritic cells. They vaccinated that 6 day old mouse. What they found was normal reaction. They had nice high levels of interleukin 12, Normal Th1 and Th2 development. And then later when they restimulated with the same injected anitgen. They had a normal Th1 and Th2 response. This is important because what he saw in these mice, is what we see in the outcome in humans. When the vaccine is done early, even with just an antigen, and no adjuvant, in one of those windows of opportunity, something interesting happens, as I just showed you. So now you can see, how the abnormal response in the adult occurred because as a young mouse it was vaccinated with just antigen, injected antigen, that's important. This involved an epigenetically hypomethylated area on the immune cells, which is part of that clamp system that we talked about. The mouse vaccinated too early had its immune system skewed toward Th2 and can do nothing about it for the rest of its life. You might say well let's leave it until kids get older if that's a problem. A 0-6 day old rodent is estimated to be around 0-8 months in human years."