"Hello. My name is Dr. Suzanne Humphries. I'm a medical doctor and coauthor of a book called Dissolving Illusions. Up until 2011, I worked in the conventional medical system as an internist and nephrologist. Kidneys are fascinating and complicated organs without which your blood, bones, lungs, heart, and brain won't function normally. Because of that kidneys are really important. I want to tell you some of the things that occurred during my medical career starting near the beginning."
"On June 1st 1993, I started a residency In NY City. One month before, the NIH held an international workshop on current issues on vaccination, a topic that was nowhere on my radar. The published summaries and abstracts from the weekend in July, reveals what some of the participants were studying. Discussions of the primitive level of the science of adjuvants, of vaccines contaminants, and unexpected adverse reactions. Interference in the normal immunologic response as a result of vaccinations, shedding of revertent virulant polio viruses after vaccinations, as well as dreams of future combination vaccines and new delivery systems."
"In 1989 I had a series of Hep B vaccinations after which I was unwell for some time, but never connected the dots, because all I had been taught about vaccines was that they were the greatest contribution to public health ever."
"Back to my real world as a newly trained doctor, little did I know, that what I was taught about vaccines and immunity meant that I had absolutely no idea what I was talking about, and left me blinded when confronted with the real world. And this is still the case for the majority of medical professionals today, who are at the frontlines of patient care. I knew nothing about vaccine manufacture, contents, risks or history. We had been told historical factoids, about Jonas Salk inventing one polio vaccine, and Albert Sabin the other, and that smallpox and polio were supposedly eradicated by vaccination. I certainly knew nothing about the developing immune system. After being handed the schedule of vaccines for kids during my pediatric rotations I was told to give them on time. That was the extent of my knowledge. As a nephrologist I gave hepatitis B vaccines to dialysis patients. Their immune systems don't respond very well. So we often had to give them numerous injections of high dose vaccine which is an enormous aluminum load. I gave flu shots, pneumonia shots, all per dialysis protocol. Never considering any potential problems. Nothing was linked to vaccines in my mind, until one patient in 2009, volunteered to me "I was fine until I had that flu shot". I thought "well that can't be!" but the other doctors and I could find no alternative cause."
"That was what I saw with my own two eyes and what my own patients were telling me. Any other time a drug was even a possibility for causing a kidney problem there was no resistance by my colleagues to stopping that drug. kidneys are so important that you never take a chance with them unless a life is in immediate jeopardy. hospital acquired acute kidney failure carries a 50% mortality rate. the answer seems simple doesn't it? don't vaccinate sick people in the hospital! knowing that I would not be able to stop the vaccines altogether in hospital patients, I simply placed a "do not vaccinate" order on my patient charts with kidney disease, whom I was consulted upon. I asked the administration to delay vaccines until discharge day. Doesn't this seem reasonable? Well, little did I know."
"In 2001, I was idealistic and naive. I thought that those involved in policymaking especially the ones whom I knew for years, would want to do what is best for patients over and above what policy dictated. How wrong I was."
"The hospital policy was to vaccinate as many patients as possible on the first hospital day. A pharmacist would go in to the patient's room. show them 1 sheet of paper from CDC with limited and biased information and offer them 2 or more vaccines. If the patient consented which most did, an order was put into the computer with the attending physicians name often before the doctor had even seen the patient and before a diagnosis had been made. and the nurse would give that vaccine. sometimes the order had my name on it, even though I had not ordered the vaccine. I was not happy."
"I decided to speak to the hospital management about what I was seeing. One day in the corridor, I bumped into the chief of medicine. He asked me how things were going. I detailed my concerns to him. According to him, I was the only doctor seeing these problems. He kept responding as if the science was settled. I got the full on historic justification. "Oh but vaccines have eradicated polio, smallpox, meningitis" as if that had any relevance to vaccinating sick adults, some of whom were on death's door in the hospital. So I put my concerns in writing. and meetings were held to discuss the issue, but I wasn't invited to those meetings. The result, I was told that acutely ill inpatients would continue to be offered vaccines on arrival at the hospital. I asked myself exactly what is the science that says that these vaccines are safe for really sick people? there must be studies on the subject, and writings in the medical literature, in order for these doctors to be so sure of the rightness of their policy. After all it's science we're talking about? Isn't it? And the science is supposed to be all settled. On the safety and effectiveness of vaccines."
"Because the hospital policies were centered on flu and pneumonia vaccines this was where my research started. I submitted a written report to the administration. In my research I found that aluminum in vaccines is a documented cause of granuloma formation something I had been familiar with for years. Aluminum is in the following vaccines; DTaP, some Hib, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, Hep B, all combination DTap, HIB, TDaP, or hepatitis B, hepatitis A, and HPV vaccines. Aluminum and mercury given together have synergistic toxicity. My patients who received flu shots and pneumonia shots would have received both. Can patients be assured that their renal interstitial granulomatous or autoimmune illness is not due to the aluminum or the molecular mimicry from a previous vaccine? moreover I found that my patient population with acute and chronic illness had barely been tested for efficacy safety and long term consequences. so the answer is no. patients can not be assured of safety."
"some documented ill effects of vaccines upon kidneys include autoimmune kidney disease, vasculitis, TTP, aluminum mediated granulomitis issues"
"He gave me a list of studies showing that some vaccines raise antibody levels in most immunosuppressed people with HIV or kidney failure. His argument was that ipso facto for acutely ill kidney patients with sepsis, heart attacks, GBS, cancer, urinary tract obstruction, nephrosis, and so on, vaccines were also perfectly safe. His letter was quite bizarre. I kept thinking "and this is the expert? why can't he answer my specific concerns? where is his proof that side effects don't happen to my patients?" nowhere could I find studies that looked at vaccines in acutely ill patients commonly seen by nephrologists. even my pro vaccine colleagues agreed that there was no scientific basis to give these injections so quickly upon admission, and they supported my motion to have the policy changed to vaccinate on discharge day. At the same time the hospital turned up the heat on me. My progress notes and hospital charts were reviewed, which was something totally new to me. Nobody had ever before challenged my integrity of my patient care. I was then told by the administration, that in order to support my outrageous claims, i should do my own study. A chart review study. I should submit it for peer review in order to prove it. But aside from doing one's own study, where would you initially go for case histories? where I had just been. the medical literature. When I referred dozens of published case histories and expert peer reviewed opinions to the hospital administration, I was told by the consultant that case reports in minor journals mean nothing, and even in major journals case histories are just anecdotal. In his letter the expert criticized my citation of non American journals, and that of my 47 medical references 1 was from a Japanese journal. He insinuated that my argument about what I was seeing in my hospital was invalid because I searched the world's literature in order to make my point. He said that because there were no published data sets showing influenza vaccines cause kidney ailments that my suggestion to exercise caution vaccinating acutely ill patients was unwarranted"
"the executive committee of my hospital also told me that it was not appropriate for me to stop vaccination orders on my patients and that I was confusing the nursing staff. I thought "how bizarre". nurses are never used to the same treatment plan for all patients ever. my experience was not one of confusing nurses at all. but of finding other vaccination critical people on the hospital staff who agreed with me. among the nursing staff there were more allies than I would have ever imagined."
"furthermore the hospital administration argued that "evidence for benefit of vaccination is overwhelmingly positive, and evidence of harm is really quite negligible." nobody in the hospital ever addressed my specific arguments. all I got were soundbytes. "vaccines are safe and effective" "smallpox was eradicated by vaccines" "polio was eliminated by vaccines"
"since leaving the hospital in 2011, more literature has been published besides Duggal, that supports my hypothesis and my experience that common and difficult to treat kidney diseases can be caused and worsened by vaccine ingredients. this 2011, NEJM article titled "Early-Childhood Membranous Nephropathy Due to Cationic Bovine Serum Albumin" details the association between circulating Cationic Bovine Serum Albumin and a very difficult to treat form of kidney disease called idiopathic membranous nephropathy. membranous nephropathy is a serious condition of the kidney filters in pediatrics and is more common in adults. long term prognosis is unknowable for certain but approximately 50% of patients develop progressive kidney disease."
"The authors must be aware that they hit upon a very touchy subject since they implicate immunization in the body of the article, but conclude by simply saying "if Bovine Serum Albumin is detected in kidney biopsy specimens, eliminating it from the diet could be beneficial" what the authors don't say is that eliminating direct injection of Bovine Serum Albumin at the same time as injecting aluminum adjuvant may be beneficial in preventing the susceptible child or adult from developing this type of kidney disease."
"the following list of BSA containing vaccines could possibly be very problematic to some people. BSA is used to feed the live animal or human cells that propagate the virus or bacteria during vaccine culture production. the implications of this article are enormous in terms of potential adverse response to vaccines that contain BSA but also to aluminum, viral and bacterial antigens. How much adult or childhood nephrotic syndrome is caused by vaccine ingredients? The issue isn't addressed in the medical literature. what clinicians see doesn't necessarily count. how many of these vaccines are given at the same time? often 8 vaccines are given at once to children at 1 year of age, most of which contain BSA and aluminum which is added to enhance the inflammatory properties of the vaccine to the vaccine antigens."
"here are the aluminum containing ones. the asterisk* at the bottom indicates overlap of BSA and aluminum."
"there is plenty of writing in the medical literature about how one size fits all vaccine programs give variable results in healthy people and they can trigger serious inflammation and autoimmunity. there is more reason in my opinion to believe vaccines are not only dangerous but also less effective in sick people. for instance, one day, when I was on rounds, I went in to check on someone who was having plasmapheresis. which is a procedure designed to remove antibodies from the blood. he had kidney failure. when I saw that he had just received an influenza vaccine I was astounded. i said to my colleagues and the referring physician who was with me "can you see the problem with this?". everyone found somewhere else to look. around the same time I went in to see a 27 yr old young man with lymphoma and acute kidney failure who was in the middle of a chemotherapy infusion and in front of him was the pink CDC information sheet for the flu shot and Pneumococcal vaccine which he had just consented to. I said to him "have they given the vaccine to you yet?" he said "No". I immediately cancelled the vaccination order. These 2 incidents typify the events which were occurring at the time and were the clinical issues that set me on today's divergent path. if someone had just used logic and agreed with me that you don't vaccinate critically ill patients, and accepted the evidence in front of their own eyes, that the vaccines were causing problems, then maybe I would still be at the hospital today"
"When you've walked away from people you really care about and a job you've loved, it's only natural that you would review the situation and ask questions like "could I have found more information which would have stopped very sick people from being vaccinated shortly after being wheeled into the hospital?" I started thinking back to things that are crucial in nephrology, like water."
"In every dialysis unit, there is one person employed whose main job is water maintenance. He came in earliest every day to make sure the dialysis water didn't have anything toxic, including aluminum, in it. The tanks were cleaned out frequently, and the water was kept very pure. Why?"
"Because aluminum is known to be dangerous to patients on dialysis. Why? Because the gut excretes most orally ingested aluminum, but the moment you bypass the gut, with aluminum injections, aluminum causes big problems in kidney patients. in the past the water used for dialysis contained enough aluminum to cause problems. we used to in some cases still do use oral medicines in dialysis patients that contain aluminum. even though aluminum via the gut is safer, we don't like doing it. a person with good kidneys can get rid of most absorbed aluminum but our kidney patients can't. however if the phosphate levels threaten a dialysis patient's health oral aluminum will bind and excrete it but the patient may retain some of that aluminum because of compromised kidney function. so here we were taking all of the aluminum out of the water and shifting away from aluminum containing phosphate binders as much as we could but we were willing to inject these people with aluminum containing vaccines. for instance 2 rounds of Hep B injections, which may not even have a protective effect, will have 3000 micrograms of aluminum in it."
"what are some of the problems known to be caused by injected aluminum? aluminum is a neurotoxin that inhibits more than 200 biologically important functions. and causes various adverse effects in plants, animals, and humans. all those years I knew what a great binder aluminum was for phosphate in the gut but I never thought that it could be a problem for the major energy molecule in the body called ATP, but it is. we know this as nephrologists, but somehow it's considered impossible for aluminum in vaccines to be able to do anything other than stimulate the immune system. we're very careful as nephrologists when treating babies. why? because the kidney function isn't the same as adults, it's vastly reduced. but when it comes to vaccines this reduced kidney function of infants is always left out of the discussion"
"I wonder where she thought it went. I was stunned. I asked Dr. Movsas if she was concerned that the aluminum was not excreted and blood levels did not rise. Obviously the aluminum was retained in tissues. Her reply was "so we don't really know what happens to the aluminum at this point in time. as you said, more research is needed in this area" she was aware that there is a problem because she referred me to Khan's 2013 article that demonstrated tissue and brain delivery of intramuscularly injected aluminum. aluminum is also injected into many babies on the day of birth in the hep b vaccines. that's 250 micrograms of aluminum, at a time when kidney function is even lower than it is at 2 months. as nephrologists, we have to study the immune system because the kidney is part of the immune system. we also deal with kidney transplants and therefore have to have a very good clinical grasp of the immune system maintenance, as well as suppression, in order to keep the transplant from rejecting"
"What I was finding out about the immune system and injected aluminum went way beyond what I understood as a nephrologist. In today's talk I'm only able to show you a very short list of aluminum's many known disruptions to life. Please see my short video titled "aluminum is toxic to all life forms" for a further description"
"the question that arose fairly early for me was, Why do doctors know next to nothing about what aluminum does inside the body? What other misinformation and gaping holes in knowledge do doctors have? And had anyone ever written about the problems with vaccination?? Was I trailblazing or were there physicians who had gone before me and had endured similar resistance? I was treated by the hospital administration as an outlier with radical and unwanted views."
"to my astonishment, close scrutiny of medical and vaccine history showed plenty of other outliers, not just Semmelweis and Oliver Wendell Holmes of puerperal fever infamy. when it comes to vaccine issues it's useful to know about the following whistleblowers."
"the first outlier on my list is Sir Graham Wilson who wrote a book called The Hazards of Immunization. in 1967. Of course I never knew of this book in my conventional years. Sir Graham Wilson was not a nobody nor was he considered a quack. Though he does say that he was once totally ignorant. The book was a revelation not just because of its content, but because of the fact that Sir Wilson was only able to write the book because of contributions from people that he mentions in the preface and in the introduction. First he talks about how the anti vaccinationist he heard of were highly emotional and irrational people"
"He thanks a former director from Welcome Pharmaceutical labs, Dr. R. A. O'Brien who had amassed records of various vaccine disasters which he felt unable to cope with and handed them over to Sir Graham, who said that it was doubtful whether the book would have been possible without those records. He mentions other people who helped him dig out long overlooked journals that were not obtainable elsewhere. This is what Roman and I had to do in order to write our book."
"the only reason we know about the vaccine issues in the congressional hearing in 1972, is because Dr. Toni Morris who was about to be kicked out of the DBS for insisting that scientific principles and methods regarding vaccines be adhered to, decided to go public. According to sworn public testimony given in S 3419, memos were quietly exchanged inside the bureaucracy over dangerous vaccines and ineffective drugs. yet nothing was done to protect the public. the senate record also included statements from other harassed DBS scientists who had less courage than Dr. Morris but were still prepared to give evidence to the senate. DBS tried but failed to fire Dr. Morris after legal challenge. As a result of the senate hearing, the DBS was remodeled into what we know today as the FDA. And Dr. Morris was transferred there. Unfortunately that change was just a cosmetic face lift. If you read the news today about whistleblowers from Merck and from CDC, you can see that nothing has really changed."
"If you would like to listen to some videos of Dr. Morris from after he retired at the FDA, go here"
"How people responded depended on their agendas. the organized crime underworld took Dr. Morris very seriously and saw an opportunity to change the power base of the mafia. Infamous mob boss Carlo Gambino took a flu shot just before he died. Apparently someone from a rival mob heard one of Dr. Morriss' lectures on the side effects, knowing that Gambino had a heart problem, and having heard that the shot was dangerous for such people, a Gambino insider was persuaded to convince Gambino to take the swine flu shot, which is widely believed to have pushed him into his grave. Make of that what you want. Many pro vaccine people today consider the 1975 swine flu vaccine incident to be much ado about nothing, however if you talk to older adults who lived in the cities where that vaccine was widely administered. You'll see that most of those people know of, or have a family member that was affected by that vaccine."
"The third outlier whistleblower you should know about is Dr. Bernice Eddy, also mentioned in the senate hearing about Dr. Morris. Dr. Eddy and Dr. Morris worked on the same floor of the NIH and were colleagues and friends. You may have heard of her work in discovering problems with the Salk polio vaccine, but did you ever hear about the early adenovirus vaccines?"
"At her memorial service, Dr. Morris said, "one of our shared interests was the fact that adenovirus vaccines were capable of producing tumors in animals. pursuit of this work did not receive enthusiastic support from the NIH administrators. every obstacle placed in the path of this work, was for Dr. Eddy an obstacle to be overcome....The result was the discontinuance of the use of adenovirus vaccines in children"
"Dr. Eddy was the first to notice that Salk's polio vaccine after mass manufacture was paralyzing monkeys. Her report was ignored. And the result of that was the infamous and misnamed Cutter incident. But the story of the cancer virus is even more shocking. Because their kidneys turned out to be a convenient source of cells for growth and amplification of polio virus, rhesus monkeys were imported to the U.S. by the millions for slaughter and experimentation through the 1950's and the 1960's. Dr. Eddy noticed that monkey kidney cell cultures would often degenerate spontaneously even when kept under the most favorable conditions for cell survival. She suspected an unknown virus. In 1959 she skimmed cell free liquid from the surface of monkey kidney cell cultures and injected that into newborn hamsters. less than 4 months later the majority, 70% of them, developed tumors. the experiment was repeated in generations of hamsters with the same results. administrative clearance for publication of this important 1959 finding was not granted until scientists at Merck had recovered previously undetected virus in monkey kidney cell lines they were using to make polio vaccine. samples of this virus were given to Dr. Eddy who injected them into newborn hamsters and obtained identical results to those she had obtained in cell free extracts 3 years earlier. SHe found that the virus induced sarcomas in hamsters, not only at the subcutaneous injection site of viral inoculation but also at a distance, in the lungs and in the kidneys. When people think of polio vaccines in the 1950's they think of the hero Dr. Salk and the miraculous vaccine, because the media made sure that that was how history would remember it. But from 1959 through 1961 government health officials were frantically seeking means to remove a tumor inducing factor from polio vaccines. At the same time these health officials were also vigorously conducting a campaign to inject contaminated polio vaccines into millions of people without telling them it contained a tumor inducing factor. That factor has been referred to today by one of the world's leading virologists as the perfect war machine. The division of biologic standards used very similar silencing and intimidation tactics on Dr. Eddy as they did on Dr. Morris. Her laboratory was downsized and her staff was removed. She had to develop innovative and time saving ways of completing her work. So she too was shut down for her findings instead of rewarded for potentially saving many innocent people from being injected with cancer viruses."
"Why is Dr. Eddy important to me? That monkey virus was called SV40 and today you can read in medical journals about the tumors and kidney diseases that have been associated with that cancer inducing virus. SV40 is something that all nephrologists should know about but for some reason they don't. SV40 is found in both healthy and sick people of all ages today, but people with a specific type of disease called FSGS which is very difficult to treat, are more likely to have SV40 in their kidneys. Ask any nephrologist about the toxic drugs used to treat FSGS and what the cure rate is and how frustrating it is for doctors and patients alike. It is documented widely in medical literature that this kidney trophic virus came from polio vaccines in the 1950's and 1960's and since then has been documented to circulate in the human population. humans can pass it to each other and we can also pass it to our children before birth. nephrologists today don't know much about SV40 because they are interested more in two related polioma viruses called BK and JC which become active in people given a transplant who have their immune system suppressed. The possible role of SV40 in FSGS just doesn't come on their rader, but FSGS is a leading cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome and most people with the disease eventually require dialysis. FSGS as a percent of the underlying disease among dialysis patients has increased 11 fold from 0.2% in 1980 to 2.3% in 2000."
"To give you a visual of what FSGS is, look at these images. A single kidney contains around 1 million nephrons and each nephron has a filter. The circular images shown here are filters, they are spherically shaped. What you're looking at are stained cross section images from human kidneys. The first one is normal The second and third ones show FSGS problems which are obvious even to the untrained eye. The filters are not functioning properly and proteins that should remain in the body leak out into the urine instead. Because of that FSGS is associated with several other derangements in the body like high blood pressure, edema and lipid alterations. While SV40 virus is found in both healthy and sick people, It is known that a certain antigen from SV40 virus results in FSGS in experimental mice. We also know that human kidney is a reservoir of more than one strain of SV40 virus. And that people with kidney disease tend to have higher rates of SV40 viral shedding"
"research in animals and humans shows that SV40 can initiate kidney injury and can also render kidney susceptible to injury. most people recover clinically after drug insults, but how many patients are susceptible to drug induced kidney damage because they harbor variants of SV40 in the kidney. SV40 is also thought to reactivate as a result of kidney inflammation and with kidney injury from various toxins. this is an area of research that is largely untouched."
"medical articles state that SV40 virus was in vaccines only up until 1963, but Rizzo in 1999 showed that with better testing SV40 could have been detected in seed stock for vaccine manufacture long after 1963."
"FSGS as we have just seen is a serious potential consequence of SV40 but equally troubling is the potential for malignant kidney transformation in those who harbor SV40. malignant transformation of normal cells infected with SV40 is a proven reality. Enders and Shein published in 1960's that SV40 virus causes pathology and transforms human kidney cells in culture. that means that it causes disease and cancer in those cells . and Dr. Eddy showed that hamsters injected with SV40 developed kidney tumors. after 1964 the medical literature is devoid of SV40 kidney cancer research. but kidney cancers rose significantly after 1964."
"look at this astonishing increase in incidents of kidney cancer in the UK. similar trends are documented in Europe, Canada, and the USA. you may be saying correlation doesn't equal causation. certainly other cofactors may exist, but the research of Dr. Eddy and the finding the SV40 transforms human kidney cells is compelling."
"causation was considered by Mortimer et. al in 1981 in a NEJM article which summarized the results of the largest cohort of SV40 exposed children. over 1000 of those children were followed. they had actually traced 87% of that population, of those children, in 1981. Mortimer's concluding sentence says that because of mounting complexities and obstacles in tracing the subjects, cancer surveillance was terminated when they were teenagers. according to Dr. Morris that would not have been a time to stop this study, but really to start it. have vaccines anything to do with this trend we see as nephrologists? because I can tell you nephrologists and urologists have never been so busy and business has never been so good as it is today."
"if you want to know why there are so many gaps in knowledge over SV40 and cancers, like kidney cancer, ask Drs. Key and Carbone. According to them and others, the controversy over the implications of SV40 damage has paralyzed the scientific research. Drs Key and Carbone also said that SV40 was in Italy's polio vaccine supply up until 1999. "
"Dr. Carbone expressed his thoughts about the suppression of his findings over SV40 and tumors in an interview. Unfortunately as Dr. Eddy and Morris would tell you if they were here you certainly can be punished for talking science"
"especially if it might make the public less willing to have blind faith in the safety of all vaccine programs"
"another area that bothered me was why do my patients not show the same side effects as each other? why do vaccines seem to be tolerated by some people and for others it can be devastating. why do some adverse effects happen immediately and others taken weeks or months to fully appear ?"
"this bothered me greatly because the vaccine program is a one size fits all operation. the hospital gave vaccines routinely, no matter what, to anyone who consented"
"however in my research I came across a very interesting study which opened my eyes to the fact that individual uniqueness has been totally left out of the vaccine effect equation. In 2013, Dr. Orntoft, published research detailing the genetic network changes in white blood cells before and then 6 weeks after DTP booster vaccination in 8 different girls. here's a list of the top networks altered after the vaccine and they are listed according to their significance. the reason this study was undertaken was that DTP shots in African studies have increased the short term death rate in vaccinees. you can probably appreciate that there is a big difference in the array of changes between these girls and why one size fits all vaccination programs can not be acceptable across the board. what this study proves, is that after a vaccine you're not just going to get a fever, DTP immunity, and a sore arm, because different genes are activated in different people. and remember these are just the genes measured in some white blood cells and not in the whole body."
"looking at a more clear slide, this is a partial list of the top genetic networks that are altered in the 8 girls after vaccination with those DPT shots."
"this is another study showing how many undesirable gene networks can become active after vaccination. this was a human study where 5 infants got the usual first 2 sets of vaccines at 3 and 5 months. then they had their blood drawn at 6 months. those blood cells were restimulated with pertussis toxin which is a component in the DTP vaccines. the following results were notes, allergy, asthma, cancer, and immunological disease genes were upregulated."
"Dr. Kimman corroborates Poland, White, Orntoft, and others who states that the immune response is highly complicated and variable from person to person."
"Kimman speaks to the likelihood that vaccine nonresponders are also those who are more likely to be susceptible to worst form of disease. what this means in practice is that healthy children who do respond to vaccines are the ones who would have had a good prognosis and would have recovered uneventfully."
"Poland's research can determine the genetics involved in both vaccine antibody response but he cannot mention the implication of that. which is that the majority of parents are vaccinating their healthy children for diseases they would have easily recovered from with no complications. nor can he tell parents that the children who do not respond well to the vaccine are the ones who will have the worst time with the disease. individual variation is very clearly seen in kidney patients because their immune systems are much more fragile than healthy people. as nephrologists we often end up giving dialysis patients numerous high dose hep b vaccines. many of our patients don't develop antibodies because their immune system don't work properly. some of those dialysis patients got really annoyed when the antibody test showed no response because then they're given so many injections, yet we can't even guarantee that these patients with no antibodies won't get the disease after they're vaccinated numerous times."
"did vaccines contribute to my patients temporally related issues because different genes got upregulated or down regulated just like the children who are vaccinated? do we have any studies to show that over a period of days, weeks, or months this is not a risk? No. But we do have genetic studies and clinical case reports that show it is possible. I believe the kind of study Orntoft did on the children should also be done on healthy people to see whether routine vaccines are a trigger for acute kidney disease and on kidney patients as well. I believe that clinicians should have access to such testing because patients deserve better care and better answers when policy results in unintended consequences for them."
"There is absolutely no doubt that vaccines are big business"